Features, South Africa

Philips Paints a Mixed Picture of SA’s Health Status

Philips' second annual Future Health Index reveals that South Africa’s perceptions of the current health system does not align with the realities.

Future Health Index - EHN

Philips has released the South African results of its second annual Future Health Index (FHI), an international survey which assesses a country’s perceived readiness to implement and integrate connected care technologies. The study, which builds on data from over 33,000 participants in 19 countries and five continents, revealed that South Africa’s perceptions of the current health system does not align with the realities.

Perception vs. reality

Local findings indicate that South Africans generally evaluate their health positively, with 80% of the population rating their current health positively (good, very good or excellent), while healthcare professionals are less optimistic. 33% of healthcare professionals agree that the overall health of the population in South Africa is positive.

Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the health of the nation are likely driven by their perceptions of access to care, as they are less likely to agree that their patients have access to care across all phases of the continuum compared with the 19-country average, says Philips.

Despite the discrepancy between the South African general population and healthcare professionals’ perception of health, the results suggest that both groups perceive they have more access to healthcare than what the system is set up for in reality, which signals that there is an opportunity to improve access to care further.

“Through the Future Health Index, we are examining current realities of how well the healthcare system is set up for the future in order to quantify the readiness of health systems across five continents to meet future healthcare challenges,” said CEO of Philips Africa, Jasper Westerink.

Where there are distinct gaps between reality and perception, it is harder to design a clear plan for future development, as both the reality and perception need to be addressed in order to advance. There is a call for greater integration globally, as the study clearly reveals that the largest perception/reality gap globally is centred on health systems integration, which also aligns to local findings.

“The general population often have a perception that healthcare is integrated and people only find that the integration is not there once they are a patient in the system,” said Westerink.

SA’s Readiness for Connected Health

The study also found that 46% of the South African population think the health system in the country is unintegrated, while healthcare professionals feel even more strongly about this (74%), an increase from 2016 (58%).

While both the general population and healthcare professionals in South Africa see the importance of connected care technology in prevention of medical issues and overall health of the population, the technology is still perceived to be underutilised.

The general South African population and healthcare professionals believe that connected care technology would make healthcare more expensive in the long-term. In order to increase the likelihood of connected care technology being used, training opportunities, informational resources such as databases of available technologies, and government subsidies to manage cost concerns, may be needed to improve health systems at a tertiary level.

“Conversely, digitisation could additionally offer a breakthrough opportunity to improve the African population’s healthcare by breaking down traditional cost structures. By connecting patients and care providers with public health workers via mobile telecommunications on available cellular networks, we can fill critical gaps in primary care and have a lower cost base at the primary level of intervention,” said Westerink.

These findings indicate that there is significant room for growth if investments are made.

“Despite these barriers, the potential for global health systems to benefit from better integration remains a positive possibility, while the large local gaps indicate ample room for growth,” said Westerink.

“However, the data in itself is not enough; it is vital that the findings inform robust debate at a local level in order to benchmark measurements and ultimately contribute to progress,” continued Westerink.

The 2017 FHI highlights that it is not only important to adapt healthcare delivery across different healthcare systems, but in the meantime address the differences between the perceptions of users of the health system and the reality of how well the system is set up for the future in South Africa.

For more information contact news@eHealthNews.co.za, like us on Facebook or tweet us @eHealthNewsZA

Did you find this eHealth article interesting or valuable? TWEET THE ARTICLE  



Subscribe now to ehealthnews.co.za and get the news as it happens